Can My Phone Camera Really Take Pictures as well as a Mirrorless or DSLR Camera?

In this blog, we will contemplate whether or not a phone camera can really replace a mirrorless or DSLR camera. In short, the answer is yes AND no, but what are the reasons? We will examine those reasons now.

First and foremost, just having a camera when you need one is a must. Many times, the moment arises that we want to capture, and all we have is our phone camera. So, especially in this case, yes! Having a camera becomes what is important and obviously, less emphasis is place on the actual type of camera, and with their compact size and multi-use, we almost always have one with us. But what if we have a mirrorless or DSLR camera with us?

So secondly, how does image quality compare? With all the new technology, phone cameras have no doubt come a long way. In certain circumstances, the image quality can be quite good, especially when photos are just used digitally or for social media. But how do phone cameras actually perform beyond that? Can a phone camera perform as well as a mirrorless or DSLR camera for media that isn’t just digital or being shared on only social media?

Thus, thirdly, we will discuss a comparison of the overall performance of a phone camera and a mirrorless or DSLR camera. In this photographer’s opinion, the no. 1 reason a camera phone fails is lighting. If it’s sunny and bright, a camera phone is great, but if it’s low light, images quickly become soft and grainy. Camera phones just do not, as of yet, perform well in low light. They also lack in pixels/resolution when it comes to printing a photo. Camera phones typically do ok with prints up to an 8×10 image, but if you need a larger print, mirrorless or DSLR cameras win hands down.

Therefore, when deciding which is a better choice in photography, a phone camera or a mirrorless or DSLR camera, the answer is always the one that you have with you. The camera phone is hard to beat with its availability, size and in the right circumstances/use for the photo, but when you have access to a mirrorless or DSLR camera, especially in low light conditions or when you want higher quality for prints, the camera phone just isn’t there yet. Perhaps someday, but not yet.

3 Primary Reasons Photos Fail

In this blog post, we will discuss the 3 primary reason a photo fails — focus, lighting and composition. We’ve all seen them, photos that just don’t work, but why? Some believe that they just need better gear, but even with the most expensive gear, images can still fall short. Again, why? I will argue that there are 3 primary reasons, focus, lighting and composition, and if you can master those, then the pictures you take can only get better.

In no specific order, we will explore the matter of focus first. Many images just aren’t sharp, and a blurry focus will break the best shot. If an image is soft in focus or if focus falls in the wrong place, it can be make or break for the overall image. Granted some of the strongest images use a balance between sharpness and blur. It’s one of the key ways to establish depth of field in an image, and why is depth of field important? Simply stated, it directs the viewer’s eye through an image, it tells the viewer what the photographer wants them to see and where to look, and even when. So, if everything is blurry or if focus is not where it needs to be, the shot just won’t be good.

The second area of a photo to consider is lighting. If a photo is too dark or too light, it just defeats the image. Too dark and it can’t be seen, too light and it becomes so bright, it washes or completely blows an image out, but when an image’s lighting is defined properly, it establishes mood, it sets a feeling or emotion in an image, and it creates a setting that ultimately gives a photo impact. So, lighting is a very critical component of creating a strong image, and it simply must be captured correctly.

Lastly, the third factor that directly influences a photograph is composition. Simply stated, composition tells a story, it guides the viewer’s eye, and it is used to evoke emotion. In photography, it intentionally arranges core visual elements, form/shape, tone/color, texture, balance etc. The elements can further be used to define space through the use of leading lines, negative/positive space, framing, layering etc. Without composition, an image becomes nothing short of chaos because the viewer doesn’t know what he/she is looking at or even why. A successful photo needs organization between the foreground, midground and the background to be created in an image so the viewer can understand the image’s purpose. Composition creates a hierarchy of what is important in an image, and it provides the viewer with a roadmap of the image, so it too, is crucial in a photo’s overall success.

Therefore, if you want to create images that are successful and that make an impact on its viewers, when taking a photograph, attention needs to be given to focus, lighting and composition. When you accomplish these areas of photography, your images will allow the viewer to see what and how you want them to see the story that you’re telling, to understand the meaning and purpose of it, and how you want them to feel. Achieve that and your photography will ultimately, find success and have an impact on its viewer.

To AI or not to AI…

Artificial intelligence, AI, and its uses have certainly become the focus in today’s world.  The various applications for AI and its technology are seemingly endless, and AI has found itself at the forefront of both personal and business projects.  As a means of seeking answers to questions and providing information, most of the time, it is most efficient, but is it really a replacement for the human brain, critical thinking and problem solving?  In this blog, we will explore just how effective it is when used with photography, graphic design and digital art.

Perhaps the easiest way to begin this discussion is to look at the how, when/where and why AI could be applied in photography, graphic design and digital art.  Starting with the why, is a simple answer because the short answer is that it becomes an effective tool to provide images, backgrounds, clipart, etc. that would be difficult, expensive, impossible, or otherwise, to create.  It is a tool, but it still needs the human brain, critical thinking and problem solving to direct AI in its creation, and the graphic can be pretty incredible at completion.

The when/where answer is also fairly straight forward because when the level of difficulty is too high, the cost is too much, and/or the means just don’t exist, AI quickly becomes a viable solution to producing the necessary images, backgrounds, clipart, etc. to finalize a given composition.  AI has become a staple in allowing photographers, graphic designers and digital artists to do what they do, but it still doesn’t stop there.

The how, lastly, is what ultimately decides whether or not, AI can take over for the human brain, critical thinking and problem solving.  The how behind the AI to yield a functional result is more complicated than the why or when/where it is utilized.  For anyone that has worked with AI, they most likely know that prompts are required and thus, it’s never quite that easy.  In my experience, and also with others that have shared in the discussion, the process of AI that is required can be very time consuming.  Prompts, many times, have to be redirected and refined to obtain the proper result; AI rarely is spot on with its first attempt.  Thus, I would argue that AI is merely a tool because, as of yet, the human brain, critical thinking and problem solving are still necessary components to AI’s success.

Moreover, putting aside creating pieces via AI for photography, graphic design and digital art, tools like content aware fill or the remove tool have become a heck of a long way for retouching images or removing unwanted objects. Thinking about how long it used to take to do certain tasks before these tools had the ability that they do, is unthinkable for me at this point.  I personally haven’t used AI much to create pieces for my work, but I do support other local artists that have created artwork utilizing AI. But at the end of the day, it’s my brain and inspiration that makes the photography, graphic design and digital art that I compose.  I use various tools, various puzzle pieces, to put together the puzzle that becomes my compositions and my style, and I think this point could be more than proven by giving each artist or creator the same 20 pieces to start with, and I doubt seriously that any 2 would be the same even with AI.  At least that’s my opinion.

Ultimately, it’s the individual’s vision that creates photography, graphic design or digital artistry. It’s the individual’s brain, critical thinking and problem solving. Not AI.  I also believe the same can be said when shooting photography. It’s not AI in its inception, but yet, every photograph has been captured. It’s up to us as photographers, graphic designers and digital artists to try to capture or convey things in a unique way. It ultimately comes down to vision and as artists or photographers, our visions have been shaped differently. We all see the world different with or without AI.  AI just becomes a tool like using cameras to create our images.  AI can expand that world and create an opportunity that might not otherwise be available.  Your mind and your vision still create it regardless of if you’re using a camera or AI to do it.  Therefore, it still requires the use of the human brain, critical thinking and problem solving, and it just really boils down to the tools that you want to use to create your work, and again, I think those answers can all be different and that’s ok. It’s ultimately what makes us artists and defines our individual uniqueness and style. So to AI or not AI, it’s an individual decision. You decide.